!" #$ %&'( ......Appellants Vs. #$' )"#*& #$ #+%&' ......Respondents Reserved on: 20.02.2026 Pronounced on: 23.02.2026 Uploaded on : 25.02.2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: !"#$ **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 04.09.2012 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 f the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short ‘1988 Act’), by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Panipat % & ' ()* # # + #, ,, ---. + / 01 # # 2 -3--44 # 5## ($' ( POONAM RANI 2026.02.25 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD 5 ( 6( $ ) ))) , ), ) , ' # #($' ( (' $( ## ( 7 ! "#$ #$+ +$( ## ($' ( +$(+' $ # 3 ! ( ), ,- ) 0 )(#" Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another ./ 0 )12'3 +1'% (( 4 ## #8 930 ! "#$ % & #$ $ ! $ ' ()*+, POONAM RANI 2026.02.25 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD -+$'()*., ./$ ' ()*0, ! ! 31 $ 1 $ $ 023 !$ $ $ (, " 4$ $ " 1 $ $ $ $ 32 $ $023 ! 023 % $ $ POONAM RANI 2026.02.25 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD ' $ ! ' " ' * * * * * * 42. # (., ( 5$ "# # ,$ )6()0-2-)-0 ,$ $ 7')8 -/+2 $7')/+)+0 $7')0+/.2 $7')..).0 $7')+./02 $ $ $7'))0)00 $7'90//2 $7'8 /)/0 7'0//82 : )(#" National Insurance Com pany Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. . 5 0 ) 064 400 40, 40;2 4<;; +8 %* = + > # # ? %@* # + + ? %"* +( $ +# ? POONAM RANI 2026.02.25 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD 7 %=* ( + #$ #> ? %A* B+ +8 #(? #$ > $ ' +# 8 952. :conventional heads$ ! ;< 1;-0$222 !$; )$22$222 ; )$22$222 ! ; = $ $ $ > " $ & : & !$ " $ $ ! $ " " POONAM RANI 2026.02.25 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD 0 & $ " $ " ! 1 $ $ $ ! ;)0$222$ ;.2$222;)0$222 ? ' &' " & )23 @ @ @ @ @ 59.3 $ 023 $ .2 $ +23$ .202 1 02/2 $ )03 : ! 59.41 ' (, ! $ .23 POONAM RANI 2026.02.25 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD 5 .2 : -03 .202 )23 02/2 ! 59.54 $ !$ +2+- AB 59.6. AC .-' 59.7 ' 59.8; $ $ $ ! ;)0$222$;.2$222;)0$222' )23 D ; )( # " *3 #' #(1' #8 +32 #9 ,"3"%$ :(; #1 3 " ( &1&'1 3 %&'( . 6 6 ) 4 + ) ' :'3 (12' ' # 9 )%&" )12' + + # #8 POONAM RANI 2026.02.25 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD 6 E21:# ? # F < 1 $G G ' G G$ G G$G G $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ! -))Spousal consortium ' G $ $ $ $ G -)-Parental consortium $ G $ $ $ $ $ G -)+ Filial consortium : " # POONAM RANI 2026.02.25 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD / $ $ 22# 7 ' H ! 7 $ $ 237A : $ 1 $ $ F :: % # % $ 24 POONAM RANI 2026.02.25 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD G G F <1$ $ ;.2$222 < ( ,4$ # ! # ##6 ' ( + # 73--. #' " FAO 1292 2006, titled as “Jasbir Singh and another Vs. Surjit Singh and oth ers”, decided on 22.03.2018 # '># 8 914:-)6-2).$' ? #$ Lata Wadhwa and others v. State of Bihar and others 2001(4) RCR(Civil) 673)$ I' EJ " " -2)- ! ;6222*' ;9222*': " ! 1 J ? -22)(.,;#; (# , /8+( " )96), %H # ;+222*' " -+ 1 H" "H K -+ POONAM RANI 2026.02.25 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD J " " 1 &G 81 4: -)6-2).$ 1 JF (JF, %H # $JF #& $ $ 61 " "% ! $ $ $ $ " $ L $ ' 1 $ $ ! 1 $ # K$ ;9$222*' $ $ & #D 4- ! (+# # (;/<=# 44 ' ( +$# # ' # > ( POONAM RANI 2026.02.25 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD B# ++ ,4$ C' ( +$ # 0 4 ' ( +$4., # +> 4, #+# +($' (> #B# # ' 5 + " ,) 47 ! ($)(#" (+# ' 04.09.2012 # +$ ' # # #8 Sr. No. Heads Compensation Awarded 4 $!# < ---. B/7-1 , 0--. %7-1<---* , = > 4., 7 --. %4 0--D4.,* 7 '!# ; 7--. %4 0-- 7--* 3 40 0 =$ 40 4 ;--. %;7--D4D40* : CA 43 ---. ; BA> 43 ---. < C" # 8>7- --- B 84>7- --- 4 - ---. 4- > - ---. 44 +% +32#( %"+# (; 5<6<6= 4 $18%"+# #($' ( (;<<= POONAM RANI 2026.02.25 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD 4, #& #8$ 3+1#% (; </<6 = 5<6<6<< 43 ($)( #" Dara Singh @ Dhara Banjara Vs. Shyam Singh Varma / 50R.Valli and Others VS. Tamil Nandu State Transport Corporation (2022) 5 Supreme Court Cases 107 < # + /<1### + # E 40 The respondent No.2-Insurance Company is directed to deposit the enhanced amount along with interest at the rate of 9% with the Tribunal within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. The Tribunal is directed to disburse the same to the appellants- claimants in their bank accounts. The appellants-claimants are directed to furnish their bank account details to the Tribunal. 4: + %* $ ;;0 ) ) F F6 +. 6 +8 G. F( 8 G POONAM RANI 2026.02.25 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD