Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7733 (BOM)

DATTATRAY ANNASO LAMBE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

ABA/60/2026 · 2026-09-08

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1/2 17-ABA-60-2026(CR).DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 60 OF 2026 Dattatray Annaso Lambe …...Applicant VERSUS State Of Maharashtra And Anr. …...Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Bharat Sonule, for Applicant. Mr. C. D. Mali, APP, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State. PSI, Mr. Pramod Chavan, SDPO Karveer Office, Kolhapur, present. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 8th SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C. 1. Heard Mr. Bharat Sonule, learned Advocate for the Applicant, and Mr. C. D. Mali, learned APP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State. 2. By the present Application, the Applicant has sought the following substantial relief: “a) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to release the Applicant on suitable bail in connection with C.R. No.361 of 2025 dated 23.11.2025 registered with Murgud Police Station, Dist. Kolhapur, on the basis of a Complaint by police constable Yuvraj Bhivaji Patil, for offences punishable under Section 62, 318(4), 3(5) of BNS, Section 6 and 8 of Shantanu S. Dhudum SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date: 2026.09.09 21:39:16 +0530 2/2 17-ABA-60-2026(CR).DOC Maharashtra Prevention of Malpractices at university Board and other specified examination Act 1982. on terms and conditions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.” 3. After having heard the matter for sometime, Mr. Bharat Sonule, learned Advocate for the Applicant, sought a pass over to take instructions from the Applicant. At his request, this Application was taken up after sometime. 4. Mr. Bharat Sonule, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present Anticipatory Bail Application. 5. This request is not opposed by Mr. C. D. Mali, learned APP, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State. 6. In view of the statement made by Mr. Bharat Sonule, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Anticipatory Bail Application. 7. Anticipatory Bail Application No.60 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn. ( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum