ADITYA SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS
WRIC/32205/2026 · 2026-09-16
Chandra Kumar Rai
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7733 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7733 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32205 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the array of the parties in the writ petition during course of the day. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned Counsel for Gaon Sabha and Mr. Nand Lal Maurya, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 3. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:-
" Issue writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to consolidate the Case No. 3113 of 2026 "Computer Case No. T202614291003113" (Aditya Singh & another Vs. Dharmpal Singh and others), Case No. 3114 of 2026 "Computer Case No. T202614291003114" (Aditya Singh & another Vs. Dharmpal Singh and others), Case 3117 Case No. No. 3115 of 2026 "Computer T202614291003115" (Aditya Singh & another Vs. Dharmpal Singh and others), Case No. 3116 of 2026
"Computer Case No. T202614291003116" (Aditya Singh & another Vs. Dharmpal Singh and others), Case No. of 2026 "Computer Case No. T202614291003117" (Aditya Singh & another Vs. Dharmpal Singh and others), Case No. 3102 of 2026 "Computer Case No. T202614291003102" (Aditya Singh & another Vs. Dharmpal Singh and others) u/s 116 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 pending before Sub Divisional Officer Sadar District Ghazipur and decide together within stipulated period prescribed bed by this Hon'ble Court." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamlesh Shrama Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Aditya Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that suit for division of holding (particular of the same as mentioned in the prayer clause of the writ petition) are pending at present before respondent no.2, Additional Sub Divisional Officer Sadar Ghazipur since February 2026. He further placed the order sheet of the pending proceeding in order to demonstrate that matter is not proceeding expeditiously. 5.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No.2, Additional Sub Divisional Officer Sadar Ghazipur to consider and decide the aforementioned suit proceedings in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. September 17, 2026 Vandana Y.
WRIC No. 32205 of 2026 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad