Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 77304 (MAD)

Yamunarani T and 2 others v. K. Hari Babu and 3 OTHERS

OA/1009/2025 · 2026-02-09

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

OA No. 1009 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL OA No. 1009 of 2025 in C.S.No.246 of 2025 1. Yamunarani T 2. Hanisha Tumati 3. Keerthisha Tumati ..Applicants Vs 1. K. Hari Babu 2. K.Ramesh Babu 3. K.Prabhakar 4. The Sub-Registrar Sub-Registrar Office Anna Nagar, Nolambur 2nd Main Road, Nolambur Phase-II Chennai-600 037 ..Respondents This Application is filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with under Order XXXIX, Rule 1 and 2 of CPC, to grant interim injunction restraining the Respondents 1, 2 and 3 from in anyway creating any encumbrance in the schedule mentioned property, till the disposal of the above suit. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis OA No. 1009 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 For Applicants: Ms.D.Selvakumari For Respondents: Mr.R.Vigneswaran (R4) Ms.M.Vishali for Mr.K.Govi Ganesan (R1) R2 and R3 (No appearance) ORDER This Application has been filed praying for a grant of interim injunction restraining the respondents 1,2 and 3 from any way creating any encumbrance in the schedule mentioned property, till the disposal of the above suit. 2. According to the applicants, they are the plaintiffs in the suit filed for declaration and permanent injunction. The applicants are the owners of the suit schedule property. The respondents 1 to 3 have no right or title over the said property, however, they are making an attempt to alienate and encumber the suit schedule property. It is further stated that if any 3rd party right is created, it will affect the rights of the plaintiff with respect to suit schedule property. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. There is no representation for the respondents 2 and 3. The learned counsel appearing for R1 and R4 have stated no objection for allowing this application. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis OA No. 1009 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 4. Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application and considering the fact that if any 3rd party right is created with respect to suit schedule property, the plaintiffs right will be affected, this application is allowed. 09-02-2026 arr (1/2) To The Sub-Registrar Sub-Registrar Office Anna Nagar, Nolambur 2nd Main Road, Nolambur Phase-II Chennai-37 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis OA No. 1009 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 P.DHANABAL, J. arr OA No. 1009 of 2025 in C.S.No.246 of 2025 09-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis