Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7730 (ALL)

RAJKUMAR VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/32922/2026 · 2026-09-15

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32922 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.20 out of 291) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. Learned A.G.A. has informed that the notice to the informant has been served on 30.07.2026. 2. Heard Sri Syed Ali Imam, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.318 of 2026, under Sections 115(2), 351(3) B.N.S., 5(m)/6 P.O.C.S.O. Act and 3(2)(v) S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station Nandgram, District Ghaziabad, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The FIR is delayed by more than one day, and there is no explanation for the said delay. There is no medical corroboration of the incident. The allegations are per se false. The applicant has simply been made an accused out of vengeance, as the victim is the nephew of the applicant. The story as narrated cannot be believed. The applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 02.06.2026. He undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application but the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant could not be disputed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Syed Ali Imam Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajkumar Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the delay in the institution of the F.I.R. and the absence of medical corroboration of the incident, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Rajkumar Verma, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. September 16, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 32922 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad