Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 77297 (MAD)

KARPAGA JOTHI v. The State rep by its

CRL RC/2134/2025 · 2026-02-20

Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL RC No. 2134 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL RC No. 2134 of 2025 &Crl.M.P.Nos.19830 & 19831 of 2025 1. Karpaga Jothi W/o.Rajasimman, No.Threed Ram Street, Pozhichalur, Kancheepuram District. 2. Porkalai W/o.Sankar, No.259, 5th Street, Pudhukooraipettai, Virudhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District. 3. Veerammal W/o.Kaliyaperumal, No.259, 5th Street, Pudhukooraipettai, Virudhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State rep by its Inspector of Police, P.S-Virudhachalam, Cuddalore District. Crime No.897 of 2022 2. Silambuselvi W/o.Ramalingam, 2nd Street, Pudhukooraipettai, Virudhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District. ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 2134 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 438 r/w 442 of BNSS, to set aside the order of cognizance on the file of Learned III Additional District Judge, Virudhachalam in S.C.No.160 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Krishnamoorthy For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for R1 Mr.A.Balaji for R2 ORDER The Revision challenges the order taking cognizance by the learned Magistrate for the offences under Sections 307, 326, 341, 352, 506(ii) and 34 IPC. 2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) on instructions would submit that the case has been since committed to the Sessions Court, charges have been framed and two witnesses have already been examined. 3.In view of the change in circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain this Revision at this stage. 4.The Revision is accordingly dismissed. It is for the petitioners to raise all the points before the trial Court, which may be considered by the trial Court https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 2134 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 on its own merits. Considering that all the petitioners are ladies, their appearance before the trial Court is dispensed with (provided they are represented by a lawyer), except on the hearings when their presence is required for the progress of the trial. Consequently, the connected criminal miscellaneous petitions are closed. 20-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No TSG To 1.The III Additional District Judge, Virudhachalam. 2.The Inspector of Police, P.S-Virudhachalam, Cuddalore District. Crime No.897 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 2134 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 SUNDER MOHAN, J. TSG CRL RC No. 2134 of 2025 &Crl.M.P.Nos.19830 & 19831 of 2025 20-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis