Sundar Sons India Exports Represented by its Partner and Authorized Signatory Mr Anil Laxmichand v. Assistant Commissioner
WP/38700/2025 · 2026-02-12
C Saravanan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 77288 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 77288 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.38700 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.02.2026
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.38700 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.43275 and 43276 of 2025 Sundar Sons (India) Exports, Represented by its Partner and Authorized Signatory … Petitioner
Vs. 1.Assistant Commissioner, Salem Town (West), Integrated Commercial Tax Building, GST Commissionerate, Pitchards Road, Hasthampatty, Salem – 636 007. 2.Deputy Commissioner (CT), Integrated Commercial Tax Building, GST Commissionerate, Pitchards Road, Hasthampatty, Salem – 636 007. … Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the Impugned Order in Form GST APL-02 dated 28.08.2025 bearing Reference No.ZD3308253349229 issued by the 2nd Respondent, to quash the 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.38700 of 2025 same and direct the 2nd Respondent to restore the Appeal filed by the Petitioner. For Petitioner : Ms.Disha Jain For Respondents : Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Advocate
ORDER Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondents.
2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondents.
3. The Petitioner is before this Court against the impugned Order dated 28.08.2025, passed by the 2nd Respondent, whereby the Petitioner’s appeal was rejected on the ground of limitation.
4. The appeal was filed beyond the condonable period of limitation. The reason forthcoming for the delay is that, the Petitioner was pursuing with the remedy under Section 161 of the respective GST Enactments as against the order dated 26.02.2025, passed by the 1st Respondent. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.38700 of 2025
5. There is only a marginal delay as the appeal has been filed 54 days beyond the condonable period of limitation.
6. However considering the fact that the Petitioner may have a case on merits, the case is remitted back to the 2nd Respondent to pass a fresh order in appeal on merits after hearing the Petitioner in lieu of impugned Order dated 28.08.2025, without further reference to limitation.
7. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 12.02.2026
Neutral Citation : Yes / No arb 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.38700 of 2025 To: 1.Assistant Commissioner, Salem Town (West), Integrated Commercial Tax Building, GST Commissionerate, Pitchards Road, Hasthampatty, Salem – 636 007. 2.Deputy Commissioner (CT), Integrated Commercial Tax Building, GST Commissionerate, Pitchards Road, Hasthampatty, Salem – 636 007. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.38700 of 2025 C.SARAVANAN, J. arb W.P.No.38700 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.43275 and 43276 of 2025 12.02.2026
5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis