Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7728 (KAR)

SRI.RAGHU v. SRI.NARAYANA

WP/32138/2025 · 2026-03-18

H T Narendra Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16355 WP No. 32138 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 32138 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAGHU S/O LATE CHINDAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 2. SRI. GIRISHA S/O LATE SHRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 3. SRI. VISHWANATH S/O. LATE NANJUNDA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS PETITIONER NOS.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING NEAR FACTORY K.R.PETE TOWN AND TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 426 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H. DEVENDRAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. NARAYANA S/O LATE KRISHNASHETTY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT OLD KIKKERI ROAD K.R.PETE TOWN-571 426 2. SRI. VENKATAPA S/O LATE KRISHNASHETTY Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16355 WP No. 32138 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS RESIDING AT HOSTEL ROAD SUBASH NAGAR, K.R.PETE TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 426 3. SRI. RAJU S/O LATE KRISHNASHETTY AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RESIDING AT BASAVANAGUDI ROAD NEAR OLD KIKKERI ROAD K.R. PETE TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 426 4. SMT. JAYALAKSHAMMA W/O RAMU AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS TAGADURU VILLAGE SHILANERE HOBLI K.R.PETE TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT- 571 426 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF AN ORDER / DIRECTION/WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC. K.R.PETE IN RA NO.12/2017 DATED 17.09.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND PASS ANY OTHER ORDER AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16355 WP No. 32138 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE CM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41