GANGADHAR PASWAN ALIAS GANGADHAR HAZARA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3525/2026 · 2026-04-28
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7727 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7727 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:12530] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3525 of 2026
------ Gangadhar Paswan @ Gandadhar Hazara, aged about 49 years, son of Late Jyotish Paswan, resident of Ambatari, P.O. and P.S. Baunsi, District- Banka, State- Bihar.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 28-04-2026 Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jarmundi P.S. Case No.101 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2), 331(4), 305(a) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed dacoity and looted the ornaments, electronic article including LED T.V., cash and other valuable. It is next submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioner that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting him under Test Identification Parade as mentioned in Para-08 of the bail application, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.11.2025 as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-
(Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Dumka in connection with Jarmundi P.S. Case No.101 of 2025 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 28/04/2026 Amar/-