Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7725 (GAU)

Usha v. The State of AP and Anr

BA/35/2026 · 2026-06-08

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040005652026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : BA/35/2026 Usha Wife of Umesh Kumar Yadav, resident of Sector 44 C, Chandigarh, PO and PS Chandigarh. VERSUS The State of AP and Anr represented by the PP of AP 2:Smti Junmoni Kochari Age: 37 Occupation : Wife of Amar Jyoti Kochari a permanent resident of Village Baligaon PS Dhemaji Dhemaji District Assa Advocate for the Petitioner : Jeetendra Singh Yadav, Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, -BEFORE- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 09.06.2026 Heard Mr. T. Lashkar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of J.S. Yadav, learned counsel for the accused and Mr. D. Loyi, learned PP for the Page No.# 2/2 State of Arunachal Pradesh. 2. It is submitted by the learned PP Mr. D. Loyi that the charge sheet has been laid against the petitioner on 14.05.2026 being charge sheet No.35/2026 under section 12/18 of the POCSO Act. 3. In view of the submission of the charge sheet against the accused, the accused petitioner is at liberty to approach the jurisdictional Court for bail which may be considered by the Jurisdictional Court in accordance with law. In terms of the above observation, this bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant