Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7725 (ALL)

FAKARE ALAM AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/22341/2026 · 2026-09-15

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing, Tarun Saxena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22341 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 29.08.2026 in Case Crime No.0445 of 2026, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351 (3), 333 of BNS, Police Station Baksa, District Jaunpur and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners after some length of arguments on merits made an innocuous prayer that before arresting the petitioners police may be directed to follow the principle laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273. 3. Per contra, Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State vehemently opposed the petition on merits but he has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the record. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions and prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and no objection by learned A.G.A. on innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, we are inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 6. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities concerned to ensure the procedure of arrest as per the guidelines of the Supreme Court enshrined in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhiresh Kumar, Sharad Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Fakare Alam And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 and provision of Section 35(3) of B.N.S.S. September 16, 2026 C. MANI CRLP No. 22341 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad