Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7718 (MAD)

Jayakanthan v. The State Rep.by its, The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/7581/2026 · 2026-03-25

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.7581 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.7581 of 2026 1.Jayakanthan ... Petitioners 2.Sathiya 3. Sanjay Vs. The Inspector of Police, Ambattur Police Station, Tiruvallur District. Crime No.75 of 2026 ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in the above Cr.No.75 of 2026 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioners : Mr.D.Magesh For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2) 118(1), 303(1) of BNS, in Crime No.75 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.7581 of 2026 2. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners under the influence of alcohol had attacked the defacto complainant and caused severe head injuries and also robbed 3 ½ sovereign of gold chain. Hence. The case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court and hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would reiterate the prosecution and submit that the stolen chain is yet to be recovered. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioners. 5. Considering the fact that stolen chain is yet to be recovered and since custodial interrogation of the petitioner may require, this Court is of the view that the petitioners does not deserve anticipatory bail. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 25.03.2026 sma 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.7581 of 2026 To 1.The Inspector of Police, Ambattur Police Station, Tiruvallur District 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.7581 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN.J. sma Crl.O.P.No.7581 of 2026 25.03.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis