HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32435 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Pramod Kumar, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Imran @ Romiyo to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 565 of 2025, under Sections 109(1), 118(1), 351(3), 352, 117(2) BNS, P.S.- Tronica City, District- Ghaziabad, during the pendency of trial. 3. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in FIR dated 29.12.2025 lodged by the father of one of the injured with the allegation against the accused applicant that he has assaulted his son Nazim with a knife and his friend Muzahid. The allegation in the FIR is that there was a birthday party in the house of injured wherein there was some song played, which was objected by the accused applicant which led to an altercation between them. It is in sudden provocation that the accused applicant has inflicted knife blow on Nazim. There is no other weapon shown being used by the accused applicant whereas the two injured Nazim and Muzahid suffered from two different weapons. The injury report of Nazim shows that he suffered stab wound in his abdomen whereas the injury of Muzahid shows that he has been hit by hard and blunt object. The applicant has no criminal history. There is consistent statement of the mother of injured Nazim, who has stated that there were other persons as well who had assaulted. The recovery of knife is at the instance of accused in absence of independent witness. The charge sheet is submitted. The accused Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pramod Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Imran @ Romiyo .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) applicant is languishing in jail since 25.03.2026. He seeks enlargement of accused on bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. for State opposed the bail application. 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considering two weapons allegedly involved in the incident. The assaulting of two injured is due to grave and sudden provocation, the accused/applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 18, 2026 Sharad/- BAIL No. 32435 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad