AKSHAYA KUMAR MAJHI@AKHINA MAJHI@ROUT v. STATE OF ODISHA
CRLMC/1251/2026 · 2026-04-23
S K Panigrahi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7717 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7717 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.1251 of 2026 Akshaya Kumar Majhi @ Akhina Majhi @ Rout & Ors.
….
Petitioner(s) Mr. Arijeet Mishra, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party(s)
Mr. Raj Bhusan Dash, ASC
CORAM:
HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI
Order No.
01.
ORDER 23.04.2026
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
2. The Petitioners have filed the present CRLMC challenging the order dated 30.10.2010, whereby Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) was issued against them by the learned J.M.F.C., Buguda in G.R. Case No.705 of 2007.
3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned Counsel for the State.
4.
Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners were earlier granted bail vide order dated 09.05.2008 and had been regularly attending the Court on each date of posting of the case. However, on 30.10.2010, the Petitioners could not remain present in Court due to non- communication by the conducting Counsel. Hence, the Digitally Signed Signed by: SIPUN BEHERA Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 29-Apr-2026 12:38:04 Signature Not Verified p. 2 learned Court in seisin over the matter issued the order of N.B.W. against them. She further submits that the Petitioners undertake to co-operate till the end of the trial and appear before the learned Court below on each date of posting of the case without fail.
5. Considering the conduct of the Petitioners and further taking into account that the N.B.W.(A) has remained pending since 30.10.2010 without any steps having been taken by the Petitioners in the meantime, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the learned trial Court.
6. However, the Petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court in seisin of the matter in the aforesaid case within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of this order and to move for bail. Upon such application being filed, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the learned Court in accordance with law.
7. Accordingly, this CRLMC is disposed of.
8. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules.
(Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge
Sipun