IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21854 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-379 Year-2025 Thana- ROH District- Nawada ====================================================== Ravi Yadav @ Ravindra Yadav Son of Dwarika Yadav R/o At - Kataiya, P.S.- Roh, District - Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 2 08-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 379 of 2025 lodged on 06.11.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 74 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of J.M. 1st Class, Nawada. 3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against four named accused persons including the present petitioner. The allegation against the petitioner is that he has assaulted the informant’s wife by khanti due to which she injured and fell down. It has also been alleged in the FIR that other accused persons have assaulted the informant, his son and his mother by lathi danda, due to which, injury has been caused. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21854 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that the informant’s side and the petitioner’s side are resident of same village and on petty dispute, the scuffling took place between the parties. Counsel submits that for the same date and place of occurrence, there are case and counter case from both the sides i.e. one case has been lodged from the petitioner’s side bearing Roh P.S. Case No. 380 of 2025 and the present case has been lodged from the informant’s side bearing Roh P.S. Case No. 379 of 2025. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that as per the FIR, there is specific allegation against the present petitioner to assault the informant’s wife by khanti. 6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. 7. However, if petitioner surrenders before the concerned Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today then in that case, the Trial Court is directed to pass order on his Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21854 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 3/3 surrender-cum-bail application on the same day, without being prejudice that the anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been rejected by this Court and the Trial Court shall pass order on the merit of this case. Divyansh/- (Dr. Anshuman, J) U T