Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7715 (GAU)

Arunachal University of Studies v. The State of AP and 3 Ors

WA/34/2026 · 2026-06-08

Kalyan Rai Surana, Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040008262026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WA/34/2026 Arunachal University of Studies through its Registrar Mr Divyanshu Goel, NH 52, Knowledge City, Namsai, Namsai District, Arunachal Pradesh 79210 VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Ors represented by the Secretary Education, Department of Education, Ministry of Education, Itanagar, Civil Secretariat, Block IV, 5th Floor, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh 791111 2:The State of Arunachal Pradesh Age: 0 Occupation : represented by the Secretary Legal Affairs Department of Legal Affairs Ministry of Law and justice Itanagar Civil Secretariat Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 791111 3:The Arunachal Pradesh Private Educational Institutions Regulatory Commission Age: 0 Occupation : represented by Secretary Arunachal Pradesh Private Educational Institution Regulatory Commission APSCTE Building Directorate of Higher Education Campus ESS Sector Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 791111 4:Tsering Naksang Age: 0 Page No.# 2/2 Occupation : presently working as Chairman of the Arunachal Pradesh Private Institution Regulatory Commission APSCTE Building Director of Higher Education Campus ESS Sector Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 79111 Advocate for the Petitioner : Teto Taba, L Koyu,Togam Riram,Nimcha Hondique,Nang walika Jenow,Punung Borang,Begi Taba Advocate for the Respondent : Tagum Jamoh, SC (Directorate of technical and Higher Education) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 09.06.2026 (K.R. Surana, J) Mr. N. Ratan, learned Additional Advocate General for the State is present. Mr. A.D. Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. T. Taba, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there some technical errors in the appeal. Accordingly, he prays to withdraw this appeal and file afresh. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the matter stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant