Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 77129 (MAD)

K.Nagarajan v. Mr. J.Radhakrishnan and 3 others

CONT P/3868/2025 · 2026-01-27

R N Manjula

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CONT P No. 3868 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA CONT P No. 3868 of 2025 K.Nagarajan, S/o. Krishnan, No.200/25, IX Cross Street, Kamaraj Nagar, Sipcot Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagir Dsitrict, Krishnagiri. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Mr. J.Radhakrishnan Chairman Cum Managing Director of TANGEDCO, No. 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 2. 2. Mr. Ramalingam, Chief Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Gandhi Nagar, Katpadi, Vellore District 3. Tmt. Komagal, Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Dharmapuri Electricity Distribution Circle, Dharmapuri – 5. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 3868 of 2025 4. Mrs. Kavitha (Incharge), Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Krishnagiri Electricity Distribution Circle, Krishnagiri. ..Contemnor(s) PRAYER – This Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for non-compliance of the order passed in W.P.No. 2584 of 2019 dated 03.04.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.N. Ravichandran, For Contemnor(s): Mr. C.Manoharan, Standing Counsel O R D E R This Contempt Petition is filed to punish the respondents for non- compliance of the order passed in W.P.No. 2584 of 2019 dated 03.04.2025. 2.A proceedings has been issued by the 3rd respondent by giving promotion to the petitioner from the date on which he is eligible to get promotion and as per the orders of this Court and also by giving notional impact. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 3868 of 2025 3.However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that despite the proceedings has stated that the notional impact is given in view of the retrospective promotion, the same has not been implemented in realistic terms. 4.However, on perusal of the order, it is seen that in the bottom of the proceedings, an instruction has been given to the Executive Engineer to re-fix the salary by giving notional impact as per the order of the Court and disburse the arrears to the petitioner. A comprehensive order has been passed inclusive of the possible mandatory benefit that might flow to the petitioner. 5.Hence, compliance of the order is recorded and further action is dropped. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed. 27-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GSA __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 3868 of 2025 DR.R.N.MANJULA, J. GSA To 1. Mr. J.Radhakrishnan Chairman Cum Managing Director of TANGEDCO, No. 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 2. 2. Mr. Ramalingam, Chief Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Gandhi Nagar, Katpadi, Vellore District. 3. Tmt. Komagal, Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Dharmapuri Electricity Distribution Circle, Dharmapuri - 5 4. Mrs. Kavitha (Incharge), Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Krishnagiri Electricity Distribution Circle, Krishnagiri. CONT P No. 3868 of 2025 27-01-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis