Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7712 (AP)

Bayapureddy Prasad Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLRC/73/2020 · 2026-08-09

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010033972020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE 10th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 73/2020 Between: 1. BAYAPUREDDY PRASAD REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS (B- PARTY RESPONDENT) S/O B. PULLA REDDY, D.NO. 7/54, SUBBIREDDY KOTTALASTREET, PRODDATUR TOWN AND MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI, VIJAYAWADA. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, CUM MANDAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE. CHAPDU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, A.P. 3. LAKKIREDDY KONDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. (A-PARTY RESPONDENT) SIO KONDA REDDY, R/O. CHENDLURU VILLAGE, CHAPADU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K MUNI REDDY BALA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. V NITESH The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.,’) challenging the order dated 21.12.2019 in M.C.No.54 of 2019, passed by the learned Mandal Executive Magistrate, Chapad Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 3. The impugned order dated 21.12.2019 passed in M.C.No.54 of 2019, passed by the learned Mandal Executive Magistrate, Chapad Mandal, YSR Kadapa District in purported exercise of powers under Section 145 of ‘the Cr.P.C.,’ has an operative life of only six months under Section 163(4) of ‘the BNSS.,’/Section 144(4) of ‘the Cr.P.C.’ 4. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous because of passage of time. No order as to costs. However, it is left open to the parties to agitate their rights in respect of the property by filing appropriate civil proceedings. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 10.08.2026 PRA 3 24 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 73/2020 Date: 10.08.2026 PRA