[2026:RJ-JP:21783] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No.7192/2026 Suresh S/o Ballo @ Balram, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Aarsi, P.S. Nagar, District Deeg (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg, District Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harshit Parashar, Adv. Mr. Anupam Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 22/05/2026 1. The instant second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.492/2024, registered at Police Station Kama, District Deeg, for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 307, 109(1), 351(2) and 331(2) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is also contended that the first bail application of the accused- petitioner was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 19.08.2025, thereafter, the statement of only one witness has been recorded so far, cent all total cited nine witnesses. The petitioner is in judicial custody since long, the charge-sheet was submitted on 28.12.2024, the charges were framed on [2026:RJ-JP:21783] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7192/2026] 08.01.2026., thus, the petitioner's incarceration period is more than one and half year. It is alleged against the petitioner that he has used the firearm, however, no injury was sustained to anyone. It is also argued that though there are 47 cases registered against the petitioner and in 13 cases the petitioner have been acquitted, therefore, considering the long incarceration of the petitioner and specific fact that no injury was sustained to anyone and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. Considering the long incarceration of the petitioner and specific fact that no one sustained any injury, therefore, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the instant second bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused- petitioner-Suresh S/o Ballo @ Balram, in connection with FIR No.492/2024, registered at Police Station Kama, District Deeg, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned S.H.O. before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:21783] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7192/2026] 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay. 8. The accused-petitioner is directed to submit his present address along with his mobile number to the concerned S.H.O. within 7 days from his release and the concerned S.H.O. shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number he shall submit the same before the concerned S.H.O. and also before the concerned learned trial Court. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned S.H.O. for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava/-83