- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17252 WP No. 31776 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.31776 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. KARUNAKARA SINCE DECEASED REP BY HIS LRS SHEELA W/O LATE KARUNAKARA AGED 55 YEARS, 2. HASTHIK P S/O LATE KARUNAKARA AGED 33 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO. 4-18/7 DANDAKERI HOUSE, YEYYADI PADAV VILLAGE, WARD NO. 30, KONCHADY POST, MANGALURU - 575 008. 3. KAVYA ABHISHEK D/O LATE KARUNAKAR, AGED 29 YEARS, R/AT NO. 1501, CI MADHAVAN TOWER, ANDHERI WEST,MUMBAI - 400 053. 4. SANTHOSH KUMAR S/O BABU MESTHRY, Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17252 WP No. 31776 of 2025 AGED 58 YEARS, R/A NO. 4-18/7, DANDAKERI HOUSE, YEYYADI PADAV VILLAGE, WARD NO. 30, KONCHADY POST, MANGALURU - 575 008. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B RAMESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCITIES SOUHARDA SOCIETY ARBITRATION COURT, NO. 62, MARGOSA ROAD, 1 8TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 005. 2. SRI SARASWATHI SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMITHA DARBHE, PUTTUR, DAKSHNINA KANNADA, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER. (REGISTERED UNDER CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1; SMT. SHRIDEVI BHOSALE M., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITON IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER DTD 28.07.25 PASSED IN APPEAL NO. 81/22 PASSED BY THE KARANATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND THE AWARD DTD 03.02.22 PASSED IN DISPUTE NO. DRD NO.KARASOWSAMSANI/2894/2017-2018 WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE -K AND M. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B-GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17252 WP No. 31776 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the parties submitted that the dispute between the parties has been settled out of Court and accordingly the petitioner has filed a Memo dated 26.03.2026. The said Memo has not been countered by the learned counsel representing respondent No.2. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the Memo dated 26.03.2026. 3. It is made clear that the amount in deposit before this Court be remitted to respondent No.2-bank, provided that learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 provide the details as to the details of respondent No.2 for facilitating transfer of the amount in deposit before this Court within one week from today. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE AP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 62