IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4489 of 2026 ====================================================== 1. Sudarshan Kumar Son of Late Rameshwar Singh, Resident of Village Kataha Janpur, P.S.- Barun, Distt- Aurangabad. 2. Manoj Kumar Singh, Son of Damodar Singh, Resident of Village Kataha Janpur, P.S.- Barun, Distt- Aurangabad. 3. Shambhu Singh, Son of Late Bhagat Singh, Resident of Village Kataha Janpur, P.S.- Barun, Distt- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Land and Revenue, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad. 3. The Additional Collector, Aurangabad. 4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Aurangabad. 5. The Circle Officer, Barun Circle, P.S.- Barun, Distt- Aurangabad. 6. The Halka Karmchari / Revenue Clerk, Barun Circle, P.S.- Barun, Distt. Aurangabad. 7. Manikraj Kunwar, Wife of Late Tek Bahadur Singh, Resident of Village- Kataha Janpur, P.S.- Barun, Distt- Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tej Narayan Singh, Advocate : Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Additional Advocate General (13) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 15-04-2026 Heard Mr. Pranav Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel representing the State. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “for quashing the order issued vide memo no. 110 dated 16/01/2025 passed by the Circle Officer, Barun, Distt. Aurangabad whereby and Patna High Court CWJC No.4489 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026 2/2 where under he acted beyond his jurisdiction and has restored the mutation status of the private respondent by misinterpreting the order of appellate as well as revisional authority and has acted in illegal and arbitrary manner.” 3. At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Circle Officer, Barun (memo no. 110 dated 16.01.2025) which can be agitated before an appropriate Senior Revenue Authority. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that they shall be approaching the concerned authority. 5. Granting said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U