APHC010416262012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY, THE 17th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 22408/2012 Between: 1. R.V. RAGHAVA RAO,, S/O. SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 55 YRS., HINDU, OCC: SECURITY HEAD GUARD, R/O. E-78871, HEAD SECURITY GUARD, RAZOLE DEPOT, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. THE VIGILANCE AND SECURITY OFFICER, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, VIZIANAGARAM ZONE, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the order dated 04.08.2011 made in I.D No. 3 of 2008 on the file of Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Visakhapatnam, the 1st Respondent herein in modifying the order dated 05.02.2003 passed by the Respondent No.2 of deferment of annual increment for a period of 2 years with cumulative effect to 1 year with cumulative effect and declare the same as illegal and arbitrary and consequently set aside the proceedings vide JA/ 118(31)/V & SO/VZM/02 dated 05.02.2003 issued by the 2nd Respondent 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 28721 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Proceedings vide JA/ 118(31)/V & SO/VZM/02 dated 05.02.2003 issued by the 2nd Respondent pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A K KISHORE REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. K SRINIVASA PRASAD SC For APSRTC 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner died in this case and there are no instructions from the legal representatives of the deceased. 2. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as abated. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 17.08.2026 NNN