Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 77086 (MAD)

S.Narayanan v. The Management, K.G.Entertainment Company Private Limited

CMP/28305/2025 · 2026-02-04

C Kumarappan, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP No. 28305 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CMP No. 28305 of 2025 AND WA SR NO. 153999 OF 2025 S.Narayanan, Son of Late Sankaran, No.12, Singanallur Post, Kallimadai, Ganapathy Thevar Thottam, Vinayagar Kovil Thottam, Coimbatore-641 005. ..Appellant(s) Vs The Management, K.G.Entertainment Company Private Limited, 3, Banglow Road, Race Course Road, Coimbatore -641 018. ..Respondent(s) CMP No. 28305 of 2025 To condone the delay of 726 days in preferring the W.A.SR.No.153999 of 2025 and render justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 28305 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 For Appellant(s): Mr.Balan Haridas For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Jayaprakash For Sole Respondent Order (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Mr.Balan Haridas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that since in the writ order it was recorded as if the workman has given consent, he preferred a review application, which was rejected. Thereafter, a clarification petition came to be filed. That being the reason for delay, the present petition is to be considered. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent would oppose the reasons stated for condoning such a long delay, which is neither candid nor convincing and mere filing of review application will not be a ground to condone such a long delay. 3. Undoubtedly, un-condonable delays cannot be condoned by the Courts in a routine manner. However, if reasons are found to be genuine, the Courts are bound to provide opportunity to the parties to adjudicate the merits in the appeal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 28305 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 4. In the present case the petitioner filed a review application and thereafter a clarification petition. Therefore, the delay cannot be construed as intentional and they are pursuing the matter continuously. Therefore, this petition is ordered and the delay of 726 days in preferring the above appeal is condoned. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 04-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No DSA To The Management, K.G.Entertainment Company Private Limited, 3, Banglow Road, Race Course Road, Coimbatore -641 018. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 28305 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN J. DSA CMP No. 28305 of 2025 AND WA SR NO. 153999 OF 2025 04-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis