Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7708 (UTT)

RAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1997/2026 · 2026-07-07

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010113132026 2026:UHC:5475 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/1997/2026 Raj Kumar --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Ajeet Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Devendra Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. 2. According to petitioner, he filed a complaint before State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Dehradun in the year 2019, which is yet to be decided. The complaint is numbered as Consumer Complaint No. 10 of 2019. 3. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs: “I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 2 State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttarakhand, Dehradun to expedite the trial proceedings in Consumer Complaint No. 10 of 2019, Raj Kumar vs. Dr. Neha Upreti & Others, and to finally dispose of the said complaint within a period of six weeks or such other time as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit; II. Issue a direction to the State Commission to refuse any further unnecessary adjournments to the opposite parties and to proceed with the matter on a day-to-day basis.” UKHC010113132026 2026:UHC:5475 4. Having regard to the fact that the complaint is pending since 2019, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to move appropriate application before the concerned forum. If he makes application for expeditious hearing of the complaint, the same shall be considered and appropriate order be passed, as per law, within four weeks of making such application. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 07.07.2026 Mahinder/