SHERU ANSARI @ MD SHERU ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3355/2026 · 2026-04-22
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7708 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7708 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:11999] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3355 of 2026
------ Sheru Ansari @ Md. Sheru Ansari, aged about 34 years, Son of Md. Sikandar Ansari, resident of village- Kadamdih, Near Singhbhum College, P.O. & P.S. Chandil, District- Seraikella- Kharsawan (Jharkhand).
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Zaid Imam, Advocate.
Mr. Biplav Bhuiyan, Advocate.
For the State
: Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 22-04-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection Chaibasa (Mufassil) P.S. Case No.111 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.358 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 111, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner used to hire tractor on rent and dealing with it inappropriately and even selling its parts, thereby causing loss to its owner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of self-confessional statement and that of the co-accused person. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the charge-sheet has already been submitted. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.07.2025 as has been mentioned in para-19 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III in connection with Chaibasa (Mufassil) P.S. Case No.111 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.358 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 22/04/2026 Amar/