Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7698 (KAR)

SRI DODDAKATAIAH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/19556/2025 · 2026-02-25

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11613 WP No. 19556 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 19556 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. DODDAKATAIAH S/O LATE SANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, R/A DWARALUGOLLARAHATTI, LAKSHMISAGARA POST, KASABA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI. SANNAPPA S/O DODDAKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/A DWARALUGOLLARAHATTI, LAKSHMISAGARA POST, KASABA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NATARAJA B.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR. Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11613 WP No. 19556 of 2025 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MADHUGIRI SUB-DIVISION, MADHUGIRI. 4. THE TAHASILDAR SIRA TALUK, SIRA. 5. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER TUMKUR - RAYADURGA AND TUMKUR – DAVANAGERE RAILWAY PROJECT, 1ST FLOOR, WAHAB COMPOUND, OPP. ZILLA PANCHAYATH, TUMKUR-572 102. 6. SRI. DEVARAJEGOWDA S/O LATE JOGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/A DWARALU VILLAGE, LAKSHMISAGARA POST, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SESHU, HCGP FOR R1 TO R5) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDERS OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MADHUGIRI SUB-DIVISION PASSED AS PER ANNEXURE-M AND ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT/DEPUTY COMISSIONER, TUMKUR DISTRICT AS PER ANNEXURE-N. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11613 WP No. 19556 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 18.02.2026 the following order was passed: “Finally a week’s time is granted for compliance of office objections. Failing which, list this matter on 25.02.2026 for dismissal.” 2. Office objections have not been complied with. 3. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE HB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8