W.P.(CRL) 741/2026 $~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 741/2026 OMKAR SINGH TYAGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amandeep Singh, Mr. Daviender H., Ms. Monika and Mr. S. Azad, Advocates. Petitioner in-person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Abhinav Kumar and Mr. Anjan Sachdeva, Advocates for the State. Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC (Criminal) with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Nitish Dhawan and Ms. Chavi Lazarus, Advocates. Mr. Dheeraj Tanwar, Advocate for R- 2. Respondent No.2 in-person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 11.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 7093/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of. W.P.(CRL) 741/2026 By way of the present petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/03/2026 at 16:53:34 W.P.(CRL) 741/2026 Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner and complainant/respondent No. 2, jointly seek quashing of case FIR No. 728/2025 dated 08.11.2025 registered under sections 420/467/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) at P.S.: Ranhola, Delhi. 2. The petition is premised on Memorandum of Understanding dated 03.02.2026, whereby the petitioner and respondent No. 2 have resolved the matter amicably. 3. The petition is also supported by affidavits of the petitioner and of respondent No. 2, alongwith proof of their IDs. 4. The contesting parties are present in court. Their credentials have been verified and they have also been identified by their respective counsel. 5. The court has interacted with the respondent, as also with petitioner, who have confirmed that they have now resolved the matter and Memorandum of Understanding dated 03.02.2026 has been signed by them closing all issues amicably. Parties now wish to live in peace and harmony going forward. 6. Mr. Amol Sinha, learned ASC confirms that the State has no objection to the subject FIR being quashed. 7. In the circumstances, in line with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303 as also in Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, this court sees no reason why the subject FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom should not be quashed. This court is of the view that in light of the settlement between the contesting parties, continuing with the subject FIR and all This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/03/2026 at 16:53:34 W.P.(CRL) 741/2026 subsequent proceedings would be an exercise in futility and would not be conducive to peace and harmony between the parties. 8. Accordingly, case FIR No. 728/2025 dated 08.11.2025 registered under sections 420/467/468/471 IPC at P.S.: Ranhola, Delhi is quashed. All proceedings arising therefrom also stand closed. 9. Petition stands disposed-of. 10. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J MARCH 11, 2026/ak This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/03/2026 at 16:53:34