Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7697 (AP)

SUNDAKA YASHODA @ SUDHA RANI v. SUNKARA VENKATA SRINIVASA RAO

CRLRC/1199/2019 · 2026-08-17

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010376812019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE 18th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1199/2019 Between: SUNDAKA YASHODA @ SUDHA RANI, W/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO 4-153, KARMIKA NAGAR, TADIGADAPA VILLAGE, RENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SUNKARA VENKATA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O VASANTH RAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O.D.NO 7-212, VEERAVALLI VILLAGE, BAPULAPADU MANDAL, RAMALAYAM STREET, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: KIRAN TIRUMALASETTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous as the petitioner and respondent No.1 have obtained a decree of divorce by mutual consent. 2. In view of the above submission and the fact that the petitioner and respondent No.1 have obtained a decree of divorce by mutual consent, nothing further survives for consideration in the present Criminal Revision Case. 3. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 18.08.2026 RSI 3 57 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1199 of 2019 Date: 18.08.2026 RSI