CRWP-2883-2026 IN THE H ( 136 ) PYARI HAPADG UT OF CHANDI CORAM: HON'B Present: Ms. Kav Mr. Paw Chandig MANISHA BATR CRM-W-380-202 1. Applica CRWP-2883-2026 1. The pre Constitution of In official respondent the hands of respo dated 11.03.2026 ( 2. At the v that the petitioners Senior Superinten 2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH
PADGARA AND ANOTHER Versus
ANDIGARH AND OTHERS ON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISH s. Kavita Boadh, Advocate for the pet r. Pawan Kumar Dogra, Additional Pu handigarh for respondents No.1 to 3 ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL) 2026 pplication is allowed as prayed for. 2026 he present petition has been filed u of India seeking issuance of a wri ondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life a f respondents No.4 to 6 and to take .2026 (Annexure P-5). t the very outset, learned counsel for tioners have recently filed a representa erintendent of Police, Chandigarh (A JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRWP-2883-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 10.04.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents NISHA BATRA
the petitioners nal Public Prosecutor UT filed under Article 226/227 of the a writ of mandamus directing the e life and liberty of the petitioners at take action on their representation sel for the petitioners has submitted resentation on 11.03.2026 before the (Annexure P-5) raising their f the the rs at ation ed e the AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.10 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-2883-2026 grievances as men considered and no this stage, the peti to respondent No. aforesaid represen thereon. 3. Notice o 4. Mr. Pa Chandigarh has ad that the needful w be supplied to him 5. In view commenting anyth of at this stage w representation dat period of 15 days law. Needless to respondents would and liberty.
10.04.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (2) s mentioned in the present petition b and no action has been taken thereon. he petitioners would be satisfied if ap nt No.2- Senior Superintendent of Pol presentation filed by the petitioner otice of motion. r. Pawan Kumar Dogra, Additio has advance notice on behalf of the r dful will be done in due course. Let a im during the course of the day. view of the limited prayer made anything on the merits of the case, th tage with a direction to respondent on dated 11.03.2026 (Annexure P- days from today, by passing a speak s to say, if any threat is found to would provide them adequate securit (MANI Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No
  
ition but the same has not yet been ereon. She further submitted that at if appropriate directions are issued of Police, Chandigarh to decide the itioners and take necessary action dditional Public Prosecutor, UT, f the respondents-State and submits Let a complete set of the paperbook made by the petitioners, without case, the present petition is disposed ndent No.2 to decide the aforesaid -5) of the petitioners within a a speaking order in accordance with und to the petitioners, the official security in order to protect their life ANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE es/No
been at at sued e ction UT, mits book thout osed esaid in a with ficial r life AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.10 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.