HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3490 of 2026 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Syed Mohammad Abbas Husain, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri DPS Chauhan, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed by the applicant seeking bail in anticipation of his arrest in Case Crime No. 898 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 352 and 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station- Lisadigate, District- Meerut. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that, upon bare perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the allegation is against the co-accused Altamash, though the present applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case merely because co-accused Altamash informed the first informant that the present applicant is also his accomplice in opening accounts of different persons so that such accounts may be used to transfer money obtained through cyber fraud; it is further submitted that there is no allegation against the applicant that the account of the first informant has been used by him to transfer any money obtained through cyber fraud; the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and no case is made out against him; the applicant has explained the criminal history of four cases, which are petty in nature. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. Thus, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusations, gravity of offence and antecedents of applicants, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to get Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Syed Mohammad Abbas Husain Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd Raja .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) anticipatory bail till submission of charge sheet under Section 193 BNSS as per the Constitution Bench judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Sushila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi)- 2020 SCC Online SC 98. 6. 6. In the event of arrest, the applicant Mohd Raja involved in the aforesaid crime be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the investigating officer concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; (iv) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation. (v) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. (vi) At the time of releasing the applicant on anticipatory bail, after verification, the concerned Investigating Officer shall also record the Aadhaar number, WhatsApp number, e-mail ID, and mobile number of the applicant, and the same shall be uploaded on CCTNS, as per Rule 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Electronic Processes (Issuance, Service and Execution) Rules, 2026. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of anticipatory bail. 8. With the aforesaid observations/directions, application stands disposed of. (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) April 20, 2026 SA NABAIL No. 3490 of 2026 2 Digitally signed by :- SALMAN ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad