Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7687 (KAR)

SMT. PADMAVATHI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/38253/2025 · 2026-02-16

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9547 WP No. 38253 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 38253 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PADMAVATHI, D/O LATE S.P.SUJATHA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, 2. SMT. Y. K. SUMITHRA, W/O LATE Y.N.KANTHARAJA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 3. SRI. Y.N. VISHWANATH, S/O LATE Y.B. NEELAKANTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 4. SRI Y N MAHESH, S/O LATE Y.B. NEELAKANTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 5. SMT. K.S.USHA, W/O K.V.SUDHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 6. SRI. Y.N. AMARNATH, S/O LATE Y.B. NEELAKANTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 7. SRI. Y.K. NAVEEN, S/O LATE Y.N. KANTHARAJA, Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9547 WP No. 38253 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 8. SRI. Y.K. PRAVEEN, S/O LATE Y.N. KANTHARAJA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 9. SRI. Y.V. PRUTHVI, S/O Y.N.VISHWANATH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 10. SMT. Y.V. HARSHITHA, D/O Y.N.VISHWANATH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 11. SRI.Y. M. RAKSHITH, S/O Y.N. MAHESH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 12. SRI. Y.M. NITHESH, S/O Y.N. MAHESH, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, 13. MS. Y.A. SHEYASHI, D/O Y.N. AMARNATH, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, 14. SMT. Y.H. NEELASHRI, D/O Y.N. HARISH, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, 15. SRI. Y.N.HARISH, S/O Y.B. NEELAKANTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, SL.NO.1 TO 14 ARE REPTD BY THEIR GPA HOLDER - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9547 WP No. 38253 of 2025 SRI.Y.N.HARISH, WHO IS PETITIONER NO.15 ALL ARE R/AT NO. 16 DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA TOWN, KALASIPALYA, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, PIN CODE - 561 203. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHOKKAREDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, UNDER SECRETARY OF REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, AMEDHKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. TAHSILDAR, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, DODDABALLAPURA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT NO.2 FOR CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION AS ANNEXURE-A, A-1, A-2 AND A-3 DATED 10-10-2025, 11- 10-2016, 03-11-2018 AND 04-12-2023 FOR RESTORE THE MUTATION IN IHC.2/1987-88 AS ANNEXURE-G, IN RESPECT OF SV. NO.40, MEASURING 4 ACRES OF LAND, SITUATED AT VARADHANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9547 WP No. 38253 of 2025 DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BY ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for both the respondents. 2. It is the contention of the petitioners that Sri.Y.B.Neelakantaiah purchased 4 acres of land in Sy.No.40 of Vardhanahalli Village Kasaba Hobli, Doddaballapura Taluk under registered sale deed dated 10.08.1972 and his name was entered in the revenue records. Sri.Neelakantaiah, passed away and after his death, the mutation entry on the basis of succession was made in IHC.No.2/1987-1988 and the name of the wife of Sri.Y.B.Neelakantaiah, Smt.Sridevi was entered in the revenue records, nevertheless, after computerisation the name of Smt.Sridevi has been discontinued in the RTC. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9547 WP No. 38253 of 2025 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Additional Government Advocate and on perusing the petition papers, this Court finds from the material on record that the name of Smt.Sridevi was earlier entered in the land revenue records. However, if the Tahsildar is of the opinion that Sri.Y.B.Neelakantaiah never purchased the land in question, nevertheless, it is the duty of the Tahsildar to secure the original grant records, Saguvali Chit issue register and other contemporaneous records to satisfy himself regarding the grant made in favour of the grantee and then verify the subsequent developments. Moreover, there is no reason why the name of Smt.Sridevi which was earlier entered in the land revenue records has been continued after computerization, the Tahsildar is duty bound to look into all these aspects and pass necessary orders. 4. The writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Tahsildar, Doddaballapura Taluk, to verify from the records and find out if grant was - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9547 WP No. 38253 of 2025 made in favour of the grantee and if the kimath was paid and the subsequent developments narrated hereinabove have taken place in a lawful manner. If it is found from the records that the facts stated hereinabove are true, then the Tahsildar shall proceed to enter the name of Smt.Sridevi in the computerised RTC in accordance with law. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22