Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7686 (CHH)

PRADEEP KUMAR PANDEY (IN PERSON) v. JAGJEET DHEER

CONT/548/2026 · 2026-04-22

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:18669 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 548 of 2026 1 - Pradeep Kumar Pandey (In Person) S/o Late Ashok Pandey Aged About 44 Years Posted As Lecturer L.B. Sanskrit, At- Government High School, Jargaon, Chhura, District Gariyaband, C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Jagjeet Dheer District Education Officer Presently Posted As District Education Officer, Gariyaband, District Gariyaband, C.G. ... Respondent (Cause title, as taken from CIS) For Petitioner : None For Respondent-State : Mr. Ujjawal Choubey, Panel Lawyer. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Order on Board 23/04/2026 1. Heard. 2. This contempt petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for non-compliance of the order dated 11.03.2026 passed in WP(S) No.7903/2025. RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.04.24 11:31:14 +0530 2 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the order under contempt dated 11.03.2026 passed by this Court in WP(S) Nos.7903/2025 has been complied with, and a fresh order bearing No.2109 / जि.शि.अ. / विधि / न्या या .प्रक. / 2026 has been passed by the respondent on 22.04.2026. A copy of the said order has also been filed and is taken on record. 4. In view of the above contention made by learned counsel for the respondent-State, since the order under contempt has been complied with, no case of contempt is made out against the respondent. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is disposed of. 5. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Rukhsar