Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7685 (UTT)

SATYA DEV TYAGI v. VINEET JOSHI

CLCON/172/2026 · 2026-07-07

Pankaj Purohit

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010057782026 2026:UHC:5467 SL. No . Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CLCON/172/2026 Satya Dev Tyagi --Petitioner Versus Vineet Joshi --Respondent Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India with Mr. Saurav Adhikari, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for the Union of India/respondent-contemnor. 3. This contempt petition has been filed alleging willful and deliberate contempt of this Court’s order dated 17.04.2025, passed in WPMB No.164 of 2025, Sukhvinder Singh Vs. Union of India & others, whereby the Writ Court has been pleased to consider the writ petition as a representation and directed the respondent in writ petition to decide the same on merits, in accordance with law, within a stipulated time. 4. From the perusal of the record, it is reflected that the order sought to be enforced through the present contempt petition was passed in a writ petition filed by one Sukhvinder Singh. The present petitioner-Satya Dev Tyagi was neither the petitioner nor the respondent in the said writ petition, therefore, has no locus standi to maintain the present contempt petition. 5. Accordingly, the contempt petition is hereby dismissed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 07.07.2026 AK AVNEE T KAUR Digitally signed by AVNEET KAUR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=a82175252dc1a0f53f0e245a1c11df9aa490cfd1403838bf52f9acab4cc3a5b9 , postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=5BEC18DADE54688668187E4D722C2EDBFDAF35AB2F676A551481B E62508FDDEE, cn=AVNEET KAUR Date: 2026.07.07 17:57:07 +05'30'