RANJAN KUMAR YADAV ALIAS RANJAN YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2295/2026 · 2026-04-21
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7682 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7682 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:11660 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 2295 of 2026
------ Ranjan Kumar Yadav @ Ranjan Yadav, Age -25 years, S/o – Jitendra Yadav, R/o –Dhawan Nagar, Kanke Road, Misirgonda @ Pahargonda, P.O.+P.S. –Kanke, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate
: Ms. Aayushi Aman, Advocate For the State
: Mr. V.K. Vashistha, Spl. P.P. ------
Order No.03 Dated- 21.04.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Gonda P.S. Case No.08 of 2026(N) registered for the offences punishable under sections 21(b)/22/29 of the NDPS Act and under Section 111(2)(b)/111(3) of the BNS, 2023.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons were involved in sale of brown sugar and 24.3 grams of brown sugar was recovered from their possession out of which 12.44 grams of brown sugar was recovered from the petitioner. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the brown sugar seized is of intermediate quantity. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.01.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by a coordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 17.03.2026 in B.A. No. 2047 of 2026. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not indulge in any offence while on bail. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Principal Judicial Commissioner-cum- Special Judge (NDPS), Ranchi, in connection with Gonda P.S. Case No.08 of 2026(N) with the condition that the petitioner will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not indulge in any offence while on bail.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
21.04.2026
Sonu/