Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7681 (ALL)

SHAMA PARVEEN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/36426/2026 · 2026-09-17

Ajit Kumar, Siddharth Nandan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36426 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Abhinab Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rafat Raza Khan, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. - 4 & 5 and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for a direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the different notices issued by Nagar Panchayat, Wazirganj, Budaun for the purposes of payment of electricity dues. 3. However, it is contended by learned counsel for the respondents that these are the only notices and not the recovery citation. He further submits that petitioner is to submit proper reply to the notices issued to him. 4. In the circumstances, we dispose of this petition with a direction to the petitioner to submit reply to the notices issued to him within a period of two weeks from today and thereafter the competent authority namely respondent No.- 4 would be taking appropriate decision disposing of the mater of notice in accordance with law within a further period of one month. September 18, 2026 Atmesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhinab Mishra, Reena Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rafat Raza Khan (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Shama Parveen .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ATMESH KESARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad