Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010075622026 2026:GAU-AS:7987 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1064/2026 SAHJAHAN ALI AND ANR SON OF ABDUL JALIL VILL- DOWARPARA, P.S. DALGAON, DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM. 2: AZIZUR RAHMAN S/OLATE OMAR ALI VILL- DOWARPARA P.S. DALGAON DIST. DARRANG ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M H AHMED, I AMIN,R ALI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. J UDDIN(INFORMANT),MR. M ALI(INFORMANT) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 08.06.2026 1. Heard learned Counsel Mr. M.H.Ahmed for the petitioners and Mr. Page No.# 2/3 D.P.Goswami, learned Addl.Public Prosecutor for the respondent State. Also heard Mr. J.U. Uddin, learned Counsel for the respondent No.2. 2. This is an application filed by the petitioners 1.Sahjahan Ali and 2. Azizur Rahman under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for bail in connection with Dalgaon P.S. Case No. 41/2026 under Sections 103(1)/118(2)/190/191(2)/324(4)/329(3) of the BNS, 2023. 3. An FIR was lodged on 07.03.2026 alleging trespass into the land of the informant by the accused persons (14 persons named in the FIR) and thereafter, injured the informant by a severe assault on them; it was also alleged that due to such assault, the father of the informant expired. A cross FIR was also filed which resulted in registration of Dalgaon P.S. Case No. 47/2026 and one of the persons from the side of the accused has also sustained injuries on his head. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the accused/ applicants submits that charge sheet has been already been filed in the cross FIR i.e. Dalgaon P.S. Case No. 47/2026. He submits that that accused/ applicants are already behind the bars for the last 87 and 89 days and charge sheet is yet to be filed in the instant case. Therefore, taking into account the length of detention, the accused/ applicants should be granted bail at this stage. 5. The learned Addl.Public Prosecutor on the other hand, opposes bail of the accused/applicants, stating that there are sufficient incriminating materials against the accused/applicants and the incident involved killing of a person. 6. The case diary has been produced before this Court . After perusal of the Case Dairy and taking into account the materials brought before this Court as well as the fact that the accused applicants are already behind bars for the last Page No.# 3/3 87 and 89 days respectively, this Court is of considered opinion that the accused/ applicants should be released on bail. 7. Therefore, it is directed that the accused/applicants shall be released on bail forthwith on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- each with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Darrang, Mangaldai subject to the following condition: i) That the accused /applicants shall co-operate with the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the I.O. 8. In terms of the above observations, the bail application stands disposed of. 9. Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant