1 2026:CGHC:18541 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1830 of 2026 1 - Govind Ram Verma S/o Jogi Ram Verma Aged About 43 Years R/o Village- Rengakathera (Bakhat), Gram Panchyat- Rengakathera, P.S.- Sukuldaihan Tahsil And District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Revenue And Natural Disaster, New Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3 - Sub-Divisional Officer (R) Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 5 - Sarpanch/secretary Village- Gram Panchayat-Rengakathera, Tahsil- Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 6 - Kirti Tiwari S/o Shri Makhan Tiwari Aged About 40 Years R/o- Village- Rengakathera (Bakhat), Gram Panchyat- Rengakathera, P.S.- Sukuldaihan Tahsil And District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 7 - Bhushan Satnami S/o Shri Budhram Satnami Aged About 43 Years R/o- Village- Rengakathera (Bakhat), Gram Panchyat- Rengakathera, P.S.- Sukuldaihan Tahsil And District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI 2 8 - Bishal Verma S/o Shri Nohar Verma Aged About 38 Years R/o- Village- Rengakathera (Bakhat), Gram Panchyat- Rengakathera, P.S.- Sukuldaihan Tahsil And District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from CIS System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ravi Kumar Bodhani, Advocate (appearing through V.C.) along with Mr. Ankush Soni, Advocate For State : Mr. Arham Siddiqui, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 23/04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs: “10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 02 to 05 decide the pending execution revenue case (Annexure P/1) (2) as early as possible within a period which may be fixed by the Hon'ble Court. 10.2 This Hon'ble court may kindly be call for the records for its kind perusal which relates to petitioner's matter. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favor of the petitioner.” 3 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to pursue his complaint / application dated 04.08.2025 before the respondents No. 2 to 5. 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Shayna Judge