UKHC010109852026 2026:UHC:5436 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/1950/2026 Arti Pokhriyal --Petitioner Versus Chief Information Commissioner --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Dushyant Mainali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Yogesh Pande, Deputy Advocate General for the State. 2. By means of this petition, petitioner has sought the following relief: “To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent no. 3 to strictly adhere to the provisions of Section 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act and do not provide any repetitive information to the respondent no. 4 without an express consent of the petitioner till the respondent no. 4 establishes the elements of public interest behind his application seeking repetitive and same information pertaining to the petitioner’s degree of Bachelor’s of Arts.” 3. This Court cannot issue any direction to any judicial or quasi-judicial authority to decide the matter in a particular manner. What petitioner contends before this Court UKHC010109852026 2026:UHC:5436 can be contended by her in her reply to concerned authority under Right to Information Act. 4. With the aforesaid observation, writ petition stands disposed of. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 07.07.2026 Mahinder/