[2026:RJ-JP:21302] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5882/2026 Anuj S/o Veer Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Dudhawat Patti Piloda, P.S. Piloda, At Present Vasundhara Colony, Gangapur City, P.S. Udai Mod, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.). (Accused Petitioner At Present Confined In Sub Jail Gangapur City). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Uttam Prakash Saini, Adv. Mr. D.K. Dixit, Adv. For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Mohammad Shahid Hassan, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 20/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.64/2026, registered at Police Station Udai Mod, District Sawai Madhopur, for the offence(s) under Sections 109(1), 3(5) of BNS and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is also contended that this is a case of no injury and the complainant Rohit Singh Mavai has entered into compromise with the petitioner and a written compromise has been submitted before the Court as [2026:RJ-JP:21302] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5882/2026] Annexure-3, which bears the signature of the complainant. It is further contended that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 22.03.2026, charge-sheet has already been submitted and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant concedes before the Court that the complainant and the petitioner have entered into compromise and Annexure-3 bears the signature of the complainant. It is also contended that if the petitioner's bail application is allowed then the complainant Rohit Singh Mavai has no objection. 5. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 6. Considering arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Anuj S/o Veer Singh, in connection with FIR No.64/2026, registered at Police Station Udai Mod, District Sawai Madhopur, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify [2026:RJ-JP:21302] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5882/2026] the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned S.H.O. before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail. 8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay. 9. The accused-petitioner is directed to submit his present address along with his mobile number to the concerned S.H.O. within 7 days from his release and the concerned S.H.O. shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number he shall submit the same before the concerned S.H.O. and also before the concerned learned trial Court. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 10. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned S.H.O. for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava/-24