( 2026:JHHC:11628 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 6172 of 2025 Yasin Ansari, aged about 24 years, son of Md. Jafar Ansari, resident of village Ghardiha, Ward No. 6, P.O. and P.S. Rehla, District-Palamau, Jharkhand ….. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P 02/ 21.04.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Nawabazar P.S. Case No. 66/2025, registered under section 105 of BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Palamau. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and only role has been alleged against the petitioner that petitioner has provided nebulizer to the infant and false allegation is made that due to nebulizer the infant has died. He next submits that now case has been compromised between the parties. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that pursuant to earlier order case diary has been received. He submits that in para 42 of the case diary it has come that the petitioner has himself admitted that he is not a doctor, he has no degree in the field of medicine and inspite of that he is running a clinic. He submits that in para 8 of the case diary it has been disclosed that one injection was found which was opened from the place of occurrence. He submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. ( 2026:JHHC:11628 ) 5. In para 42 of the case diary it has come that the petitioner has himself admitted that he is not a doctor, he has no degree in the field of medicine and having no license and inspite of that he is running a clinic. The treatment was provided by the petitioner due to that the infant has died. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner and accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. Dt.21.04.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-