Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5814 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2023 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Khagaria ====================================================== Nilesh Sahu Son of Ramesh Kumar Sahu @ Ramesh Sahu @ Ramesh Kumar Resident of- itarsi Budhi Mate Mandir, Near Shakti Nagar, P.S.- Itarsi, District- Hoshangabad (Narmadapuram) (Madhya Pradesh) ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Sachina, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 31-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 20 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 419, 420, 379, 467, 468, 471, 120B/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 66D of the I.T. Act.. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 17.01.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 58377 of
2024.
3. Against the aforesaid order, the petitioner had approached the Hon’ble Supreme Court in S.L.P. No. 13531/2025 which has been rejected vide order dated
08.10.2025.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5814 of 2026(3) dt.31-03-2026 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. Learned counsel further submits that he has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 29.02.2024. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.
5. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the trial is going on and in the trial, three witnesses have been examined.
6. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
7. Considering the aforesaid circumstances and the
judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of X vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr., 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3539 , this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
8. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T