Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7663 (ALL)

MAYA SHANKAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/39041/2026 · 2026-09-15

Saurabh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 39041 of 2026 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. On the request of learned counsel for applicant, this matter is being taken up out of turn considering the urgency. 2. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for State. 3. The present application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed for seeking quashing non-bailable warrant dated 28.02.2024 and 27.08.2026 passed by learned Additional Session Judge, Court No.1, Azamgarh in Session Trial No.643 of 2017, arising out of Case Crime No.415 of 2015, under sections 323/34, 325/34, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Phoolpur, District- Azamgarh. 4. On perusal of entire record appended along with instant application, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned non-bailable warrant issued in the said case, can be set aside. 5. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 6. Lastly, learned counsel for applicant submitted that liberty may be granted to applicant to surrender before the court concerned in pursuance to non- bailable warrant dated 28.02.2024 and 27.08.2026 issued against him to which learned AGA has no objection. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the applicant to appear before learned court concerned in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Babu Lal Ram Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Maya Shankar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) pursuance to non-bailable warrant dated 28.02.2024 and 27.08.2026 and prefer bail within three weeks from today. Till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be initiated against the applicant. After the expiry of aforesaid period of three weeks, learned concerned court is directed to proceed as per law. 8. However, it is made clear that applicant may not be compelled to prefer fresh bond and sureties, since they have already been granted bail in this case. September 16, 2026 Saif NA528 No. 39041 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad