[2026:RJ-JP:20294] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5574/2026 Gyarsilal Saini S/o Chauthmal Saini, R/o Plot No. P-6D, Engineers Colony, Manyawas, Mansarovar, Jaipur. (At Present Accused Is Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Gurjar, Adv. For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, PP Mr. Ramavtar Neralpuriya, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 13/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of the accused-petitioner in connection with Case No.302/2016, titled as Shyojiram Choudhary vs. Gyarsilal Saini, for the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 23.03.2026, the petitioner bail bonds were forfeited by the Court on 29.11.2023, further conclusion of the trial may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. It is contended by learned counsel for the complainant that the matter is listed for final arguments under Section 138 of N.I. Act. The petitioner remained absent on five [2026:RJ-JP:20294] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5574/2026] occasions i.e. on 27.03.2019, 25.02.2022, 24.04.2023, 29.11.2023 and lastly on 02.04.2024. The petitioner remained absent from 02.04.2024 to 23.03.2026, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the fact that the petitioner remained absent during trial on five occasions and that too for quite a long period and that the matter is listed for final argument, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the instant bail application of the accused- petitioner is hereby dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-67