HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33314 of 2026 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Roshan Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 174 of 2026, under Sections 85, 80(2) of B.N.S., and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police station Kachhawa, District Mirzapur, during the pendency of the trial. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is the unmarried sister-in-law (nanad) of the deceased, who committed suicide by hanging herself at her parental home after a petty dispute over household issues. It is further submitted that the deceased also left a suicide note, wherein a general allegation has been made against all the family members, including the present applicant, regarding harassment of the deceased over household issues, but a specific allegation of harassment has been made against the mother-in-law of the deceased. The applicant has been falsely implicated merely because she is the unmarried sister-in-law (nanad) of the deceased, though there is no allegation of harassment of the deceased for non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry, nor is there any sufficient material against her to show that she harassed the deceased for non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry prior to her death. The applicant has been falsely implicated by making general and vague allegations along with other family members. It is further submitted that for invoking the presumption of dowry death in a case of death under unnatural circumstances within seven years of marriage, there must be sufficient material to show that the deceased was subjected to cruelty soon before her death, but there is no such material. 4. It is lastly submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed by the police; therefore, there is no requirement for custodial interrogation. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history and, being a lady, she is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sushama .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) entitled to be released on bail in view of Section 480 BNSS. The applicant is a law-abiding citizen and has been languishing in jail since 01.08.2026. In case she is granted bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 5. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the fact that applicant is the unmarried sister-in-law (nanad) of the deceased and also keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of the accused and also taking into account overcrowded jails and heavy pendency of criminal cases before the trial courts as well as considering the mandate of the judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Kapil Wadhawan vs Central Bureau of Investigation reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 3038 as well as guideline of this Court in the case of Maya Tiwari Vs. State of U.P., 2024 SCC Online All 6765 regarding grant of bail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the present application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Sushama, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by her. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. BAIL No. 33314 of 2026 2 10. Verification of mobile number and Aadhaar card of the applicant as well as sureties should be verified by the court concerned. 11. It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days. 12. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant. 13. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through Jail Superintendent, Mirzapur via e-mail or on e-prison portal and Trial Court via e-mode within 24 hours in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023 reported in (2024) 10 SCC 685 as well as Pila Pahan@Peela Pahan and others Vs. State of Jharkhand and another, in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 169 of 2025, decided on 29.05.2026. 14. Application, if any, stands disposed of. (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) September 18, 2026 SA BAIL No. 33314 of 2026 3 Digitally signed by :- SALMAN ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad