HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 30517 of 2024 Court No. - 81 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed to quash charge sheet dated 28.02.2024 and cognizance and summoning order dated 03.05.2024 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 480 of 2024 (State Vs. Hamad @ Hamdu Maya & Ors) arising out of case crime no.195 of 2023 under sections- 147, 148, 427, 452, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Kareili, District-Prayagraj. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that no offence is made out against the applicants and that the present prosecution has been instituted with a mala fide intention to cause harassment. 4. In the absence of any of the grounds recognized by the Supreme Court which may justify the quashing of the complaint or the impugned proceedings, the prayer for quashing the same is refused, as no abuse of the process of the Court is made out. The summoning court is vested with sufficient powers to discharge the accused even before the stage of framing of charges, if, for reasons to be recorded, it considers the charge to be groundless. 5. As requested, the applicants are permitted to appear before the concerned court within 30 days from today through counsel and move an application seeking discharge. 6. No coercive measures shall be adopted against the applicants for a period Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Gupta, Mohd. Faizan Ali, Shiv Shankar Kaithal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Arif @ Mohd Areeb And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) of 30 days from today or till the filing of the discharge application, whichever is earlier. 7. If the concerned court, after hearing the counsel for the accused, is persuaded to take the view that the accused ought not to have been summoned and that the charge is groundless, it shall not abstain from discharging the accused merely on the ground that the material available at the time of summoning is the same as that available at the time of consideration of the discharge application. 8. On the other hand, if the court, after hearing the counsel for the accused, holds the view that the accused has been rightly summoned and that the material on record does not indicate the charges to be groundless, it shall pass an order to that effect and proceed further in the matter in accordance with law. It shall also be at liberty to adopt such measures as are permissible in law to secure the presence of the accused. 9. In case, applicant or his counsel does not appear to press the discharge application despite being afforded opportunity given by the trial court, the trial court shall proceed to decide the same on merits after considering the material available on record. 10. With the aforesaid observations, this application stands disposed of. September 16, 2026 Akbar A482 No. 30517 of 2024 2 (Madan Pal Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AKBAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad