RAUTU LOHRA ALIAS RAWTU NAG v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3358/2026 · 2026-04-22
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7653 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7653 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:11984] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3358 of 2026
------ Rautu Lohra @ Rawtu Nag aged about 30 years, Son of Late Gopal Lohra, Resident of Village: Poseya, Post Office:- Bhandra, Police Station: Khunti, District- Khunti.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate.
For the State
: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 22-04-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 5 of 2026, arising out of Karra P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 311 of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed robbery and looted Rs.3,00,000/- kept beneath the seat and also taken away the mobile of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the co-accused persons with similar allegations, have already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.02.2026 passed in B.A. No.12094 of 2025, dated 12.03.2026 passed in B.A. No. 1624 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 14th July, 2025 as mentioned in para-18 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-III, Khunti in connection with S.T. Case No. 5 of 2026, arising out of Karra P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 22/04/2026 Amar/