Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7653 (AP)

KRIPANAND TRIPATHI UJELA IPS v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/11808/2024 · 2026-08-04

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010230582024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11808 OF 2024 Between: 1. KRIPANAND TRIPATHI UJELA IPS, S/o Mahanand Tripathi, Age 55 years, R/o Bs 3/2 IAS IPS colony. Road number 10 Banjara hills Hyderabad 500034 ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its PrI. Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi, Amaravati. 2. The Director General of Police, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh. 3. Additional Director General of Police Intelligance, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The State Level Security Review Committee, State of Andhra Pradesh, Police Head Quarters Mangalagiri, Guntur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomaybe pleased to pass a writ, order or direction, more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the high handed action of the respondents in withdrawing the petitioners personal security 2 plus 2 and further not considering the petitioner representation vide letter dt 09-03- 2 2024 requesting to restore the petitioner personal security of 2 plus 2 and further provide bullet proof vehicle and resident guards in light of threat perception as illegal arbitrary and violative of Art 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents herein to obtain fresh threat perception of the petitioner from the concerned unit officer and the same may be placed in the next review committee and consider it on merits and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to restore petitioners 2+2 personal security officers and further provide bullet proof vehicle and resident guards in view of high threat perception to the Petitioner herein and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: JAVVAJI SARATH CHANDRA Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11808 of 2024 The Court made the following Order: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive, for further adjudication. 2. 2. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 05.08.2026 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11808 of 2024 Date: 05.08.2026 PSA