J. S. JOSHI (DECEASED) THR. LRS. SMT. JAYSHRI J. JOSHI (DECEASED) THR. LRS. 1A AND 1F AND ORS. v. DAYANANAD BABURAO CHOGLE (DECEASED) AND ORS.
IA/7092/2026 · 2026-09-08
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7649 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7649 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7092 OF 2026 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO.17973 OF 2026 Sudesh Janardan Joshi & Ors. .. Petitioner Vs. Prasad Vasant Chogle & Anr. .. Respondents Adv. Jayesh Jayale, for the Applicant.
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
Date : 8th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C. :
1. The application is filed seeking restoration of the Civil Revision Application, which came to be dismissed on account of non-removal of office objection.
2. It is pointed out that the, Registrar (Judicial) by order dated 10th August 2026 directed Petitioner to remove office objection within two weeks, failing which the Petition was liable to be dismissed. The Petitioner, however, failed to remove office objections as he inadvertently failed to take notice of the matter before the Registrar. Consequently, the Civil Revision Application came to be dismissed upon noticing the dismissal, the present 1/2 905.IA.7092.2026.doc Sufiyan Syed - PA
application is filed, seeking restoration of the Civil Revision Application.
3. Considering the reason given, the order of the Registrar (Judicial) dated 10th August 2026 is quashed.
4. The Interim Application is disposed of.
5. The Civil Revision Application is restored to file.
6. Three weeks time granted to remove office objections, failing which, the order of the Registrar (Judicial) dated 10th August 2026 will stand restored.
7. List the Civil Revision Application on 29th September 2026.
(ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.) 2/2 905.IA.7092.2026.doc Sufiyan Syed - PA