Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010170472025 2026:GAU-AS:8043 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2797/2025 DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER CHANGLANG, D.N.A RESIDENT OF PO AND PS CHANGLANG, ARUNACHAL PRADESH-792120 VERSUS JYOSTNA CHETIA @ JYOTSNA CHUTIA AND 2 ORS WIFE OF LATE PRAMUD CHETIA @ PRAMOD CHETIA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JAMTOLA DIGBOI, DISTRICT TINSUKIA, ASSAM P/A-MAMORANI GAON, TINSUKIA, ASSAM-786170 2:RUBUL CHETIA SON OF LATE PRAMUD CHETIA @ PRAMOD CHETIA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- JAMTOLA DIGBOI QTR. NO. 998A P/S. DIGBOI DISTRICT TINSUKIA ASSAM P/A- MAMORANI( MAKUM) MAJ MAMORANI GAON TINSUKIA-786170 ASSAM 3:ROCKTEEM CHETIA SON OF LATE PRAMUD CHETIA @ PRAMOD CHETIA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- JAMTOLA DIGBOI QTR. NO. 998A P/S. DIGBOI DISTRICT TINSUKIA ASSAM P/A- MAMORANI( MAKUM) Page No.# 2/4 MAJ MAMORANI GAON TINSUKIA-786170 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M R ADHIKARI, Advocate for the Respondent : MR D MONDAL(R 1 TO 3), Linked Case : RP(FAM.CT.)/0/0 THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER CHANGLANG DNA RESIDENT OF PO AND PS CHANGLANG ARUNACHAL PRADESH VERSUS SMT JYOSTNA CHETIA ALIAS JYOTSNA CHUTIA AND 2 ORS WIFE OF LATE PRAMUD CHETIA ALIAS PRAMOD CHETIA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JAMTOLA DIGBOI QTR NO 998A PS DIGBOI DISTRICT TINSUKIA ASSAM P/A MAMORANI GAON TINSUKIA ASSAM 2:SRI RUBUL CHETIA SON OF LATE PRAMUD CHETIA ALIAS PRAMOD CHETIA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JAMTOLA DIGBOI QTR NO 998A PS DIGBOI DISTRICT TINSUKIA ASSAM P/A MAMORANI MAKUM MAJ MAMORANI GAON TINSUKIA ASSAM 3:SRI ROCKTEEM CHETIA SON OF LATE PRAMUD CHETIA ALIAS PRAMOD CHETIA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JAMTOLA DIGBOI QTR NO 998A PS DIGBOI DISTRICT TINSUKIA ASSAM P/A MAMORANI MAKUM MAJ MAMORANI GAON TINSUKIA ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : ARUN CHANDRAN Advocate for : appearing for SMT JYOSTNA CHETIA ALIAS JYOTSNA CHUTIA AND 2 ORS Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER 08/06/2026 The instant application under Section 5 of the limitation Act has been filed by the applicant/appellant praying for condonation of delay of 136 days in filing the connected MAC Appeal. 2. Heard Mr. Arun Chandran, learned counsel appearing for the appellant/applicant. Also heard Mr. T. Kalita, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. D. Mandal, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3. 3. The learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that they do not have any objection regarding the condonation of delay. 4. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the grounds for the delay has been set out at paragraph 2 of the application. The Court has perused the application and the pleadings therein and find that the applicant has been able to show sufficient cause for the delay of 136 days. 5. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the instant application is allowed and the delay of 136 in filing the connected appeal is condoned. 6. The Registry is directed to register the MAC Appeal and thereafter, list the same for admission after 2 (two) weeks. Page No.# 4/4 JUDGE Comparing Assistant