MANDIR SHIVALYA through its MOHITMIN GOPAL KRISHAN v. ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS
CMPMO/681/2025 · 2026-03-12
Romesh Verma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7646 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7646 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1( 2026:HHC:6974 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.681 of 2025 Date of Decision : 12.03.2026
Mandir Shivalya ...Petitioner Versus Ashok Kumar & ors ...Respondents
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma. Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr.
Hamender
Singh
Chandel, Advocate.
Romesh Verma, Judge(oral) After hearing for some time, learned counsel for the respondents submits that on instructions he may be permitted to withdraw the application, which was filed by the defendants/respondents under the provisions of Order 8 Rule 1 A (3) C.P.C. As per learned counsel the application does not contain all the details and averments which are required to be proved in the case at hand
2. The said submissions of learned counsel for the respondents are opposed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. However, keeping in view the fact that the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2( 2026:HHC:6974 ) documents in question are already on record, the prayer for withdrawal of said application on behalf of the respondents is accepted, with liberty to file an appropriate fresh application in accordance with law. The order which has been passed by the learned trial Court on 23.08.2025, loses its efÏcacy.
3. Needless to say, the present petitioner shall have the right to oppose the said fresh application on all the available grounds.
4. In view of above, present petition stands disposed off. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(Romesh Verma),
Judge 12.03.2026 (veena)